To better understand the impacts of mass incarceration and the impacts of the carceral system, we need to put it into context. These resources highlight different groups that research, report on, and advocate to minimize imprisonment and criminalization.
Understanding incarceration broadly and its intersection with education is an important first step in creating relations with people who are incarcerated and system-impacted. , How we talk about and to people who are incarcerated and system impacts is also crucial to reframing our beliefs and understanding of the carceral system in the United States and globally. Check out these resources to learn more about how to talk about and report on incarceration, incarcerated people, and those impacted by the carceral system.
The key to assisting people with their research is truly understanding their needs, even when those individuals might be a bit uncertain what they're looking for. This can be challenging under any circumstances, but it's especially challenging when you can't ask for clarification.
Closely reading assignments and communications from the students you're assisting can go a long way in identifying what kinds of resources might be most useful to the student.
In academic research, it's important to be able to distinguish between different types of sources. These differences often are contextual, meaning that a single source might fit in different categories depending on how you are using it and in what academic discipline you are writing.
Primary sources are the raw materials of scholarship.
Secondary sources report on or interpret primary sources.
Tertiary sources synthesize and present overviews of primary and secondary sources.
Scholarly sources present sophisticated, researched arguments using both primary and secondary sources and are written by experts.
Popular sources aim to inform or entertain and are intended for a general, non-specialized audience. In academic writing, popular sources most often are analyzed as primary sources.