Skip to Main Content

PSYC 101: Introductory Psychology

Psychology 101 - Course Description

Humans are complex organisms, and psychology provides a rich, interdisciplinary understanding of the study of mental life, experience, and behavior. Through this course, students develop an appreciation for these complexities by focusing on individual and social behavior, as well as the physiological and neurological processes underlying them. Central to this course is an understanding of the diverse methods, experimental designs, foundational theories, and research used to inform the various subdisciplines in psychology. Topics frequently covered in this survey course include: research methods, sensation and perception, learning and memory, developmental, personality, abnormal, and social psychology.

Psychology Research

Empirical Research
According to the APA Dictionary of Psychology to be 'empirical' research is "1. derived from or denoting experimentation or systematic observations as the basis for conclusion or determination, as opposed to speculative, theoretical, or exclusively reason-based approaches. 2. based on experience."

Peer Review
Refers to the process that a scholarly book or journal article goes through when an authors research and writing is evaluated by experts in their discipline or field.  In the case of a journal article, peers review articles to determine if they'll be accepted and published in a specific journal.  In the case of psychology journals expert peers are evaluating and checking the accuracy and originality of the research being reported on.

Primary and Secondary Sources in Psychology

Primary Sources:  Are original materials based on first-hand accounts of research conducted by the author(s).  They are usually written at the time the research is occurring or shortly after the research is complete, and they present new information or discoveries.

Secondary Sources:  Describe, analyze or interpret information from a primary source or event.  They are removed from the original research, and are often written after-the-fact generally by someone other than the original researcher.  Secondary sources often are finding tools, like literature reviews, that point to the primary sources.

Why is this important?  In order for research to have credibility it needs to be founded on empirical evidence.  Interpretations are important, but in order to trust research peers need to see the original evidence or specific data that a study is based on.

 

 

Primary Sources in Psychology

Are original materials based on first-hand accounts of research conducted by the author(s). They are usually written at the time the research is occurring or shortly after the research is complete, and they present new information or discoveries.

Primary sources in psychology:

  • are written accounts of original research, study, or experimentation conducted by the author(s) of the resource.
  • are written accounts of primary research and are typically published in scholarly, peer-reviewed, journals, and are often published by professional associations or academic institutions.
  • are often research articles and generally contain standard components, and follow a specific format or pattern.
    • typically they include an abstract, a methods section, discussion, a conclusion and references.
  • can be found by looking for clues.
    • read the abstract of an article and look for statements like:
      • The research we conducted shows . . .
      • The aim of our study was . . .
      • We looked at two groups of children . . .
      • Our research concluded that . . .

Types of Sources

Types of Sources
  Scholarly Sources Popular Sources
Primary
  • Peer Reviewed
  • Published in a scholarly journal
  • Contains first-hand reports of research presented by the person or team that did the research.
  • We cite these to reference the results and discussion of their research.
  • Not peer-reviewed
  • Published anywhere
  • E.g. Someone doing their own experiment and posting it on their blog
  • E.g. A news organization conducting their own research and releasing their own data visualizer
  • (In the social sciences and humanities, these can be historical documents, art, speeches, etc. But we don't use these in the sciences)
  • We don't cite these because they haven't been peer reviewed.
Secondary
  • Peer reviewed
  • Published in a scholarly journal
  • Draw on other scholarly publications to come up with their own conclusions
  • There are two main types: "Narrative Reviews" and "Systematic Reviews/Meta Analyses"
  • We cite systematic reviews because they mathematically compare studies on the same topic to determine an overall trend
  • Narrative reviews do not systematically compare studies, only mention them, so we generally cite primary-source studies instead of these.
  • Narrative reviews are generally considered "expert opinion", which is weaker evidence than the results of a study.
  • Reports on and draws conclusions from primary scholarly sources.
  • Published anywhere
  • News article, press release, trade publication, blog post, etc.
  • We don't cite these because if they just report on a primary source, we should go to the primary source itself, and if they provide analysis, that analysis hasn't been peer reviewed.