1. Look at the outline of the Library of Congress classification system: https://www.loc.gov/catdir/cpso/lcco/ 

• How does the LoC classification system categorize knowledge?  Does it completely capture human knowledge?  
• What does this schema tell us about the worldview of the people who designed it?
• Is there anything you like about this schema?  
• How would you critique this schema?

2. Look in particular at subclass B: https://www.loc.gov/aba/cataloging/classification/lcco/lcco_b.pdf

• Why do you think Philosophy, Psychology, and Religion are grouped into one subclass?
• Where is magic in this subclass?  What does that tell you about the worldview of the people who designed it?
• What details stand out to you about the way the subclassifications are labeled and organized?

Link to Library of Congress subject headings: https://www.loc.gov/aba/publications/FreeLCSH/freelcsh.html

Suggested reading:

Hajibayova, Lala, and Wayne Buente. “Representation of Indigenous Cultures: Considering the Hawaiian Hula.” Journal of Documentation 73, no. 6 (2017): 1137–1148.